The few sources that discuss him do so only briefly, and rely mostly either on a handful of recycled documents from the Foreign Relations of the United States, or on recycled innuendo and secondhand information. The Asia Foundation’s website entry on Blum not only omits a considerable amount of information, it contains factual inaccuracies. Even the CIA’s website contains some inaccurate information on Blum’s career. In contrast, this article (and its follow-up on the Asia Foundation) are based on a review of more than 200 primary source documents, almost all of them previously classified, totaling well over 1,000 pages of information.

According to the available records, Blum began his career as an academic relatively quietly. At Yale University, he was a research assistant and an instructor for international relations until 1942. After the attack on Pearl Harbor led to the United States joining World War II, and the eventual creation of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) in June 1942, Blum left his position at Yale to join the war effort. Specializing in counterintelligence, planning, and liaison, Blum spent much of his time during the war split between Washington D.C., London, and Paris. By late 1944, Blum had been made the Chief of the X-2 Branch in Paris, the OSS’ counterintelligence branch. By early 1946, Blum was helping direct all of the OSS’ counterintelligence operations as the Assistant Chief of the X-2 Branch. When his obituary was published, his work with the OSS remained largely classified. His OSS service was only briefly acknowledged in obituary, and no information was provided about the type of work he did.

Blum’s service, however, didn’t end with the OSS, but continued with the organization’s transformation into the Strategic Services Unit and then the Central Intelligence Group (CIG), the direct predecessors to CIA. According to a previously TOP SECRET diary of former CIG Director (and later CIA Director) Roscoe Hillenkoetter, on July 11, 1947 the Director was introduced to Blum, who had “recently returned from CIG duty in Switzerland” and had returned to Washington for reassignment.

While the National Security Act of 1947 would be signed several weeks later, replacing the CIG with the Central Intelligence Agency and creating the National Security Council (NSC), it seems that Blum did not join the CIA. Instead, he became the assistant to Secretary of Defense James Forrestal for NSC and CIA affairs.

While in that position, and in subsequent posts, Blum would work very closely with the Agency. However, there’s no evidence that he worked directly for the Agency, despite reporting from the New York Times and later by other sources which would cite an out of print book written by Colonel Corson. Since Corson wasn’t a member of the Agency and documents do not appear to confirm an allegation attributed to his “bitter, cynical and smart alecky book,” the allegation isn’t being taken at face value, or as a reflection of the actual chain of command. Without knowing the identities of the New York Times’ sources, it’s impossible to determine whether they made a similar mistake in reporting that sources said Blum had left the Agency to run the Asia Foundation. However, as discussed further below, documents show that Blum was actually employed by the government at the same time that he was running the Asia Foundation.

Outside of his presidency of the Asia Foundation, Blum’s best known (in CIA’s internal histories, at least) for his CIA-related work on the NSC Intelligence Survey Group, which produced the Dulles-Jackson-Correa Report (also known as Intelligence Survey Group (ISG) and the Dulles Report). During this time, Blum was “loaned” from Forrestal’s staff to the ISG, for which he headed the staff. It appears that, at this time, Blum was paid “‘out of funds available to the NSC and the Central Intelligence Agency.” Considering the circumstances of his employment, as well as the numerous pieces of correspondence Blum wrote on NSC letterhead, including ones to senior CIA personnel, it seems likely that Blum’s work fell more directly under the NSC’s purview than CIA’s.

However, Blum’s full role in the committee has been largely ignored by history outside of his handful of mentions in the Agency’s internal histories. Blum was not only in charge of the staff work, he was at least partially responsible for the creation of the working group in the first place.

As one internal history noted, Blum was no doubt pleased with this result. As noted below, he was similarly amused when he was later responsible for helping draft the response to the group’s work.

While it might be tempting to dismiss Blum’s work on the staff as merely administrative, this would contradict the repeated statements of Allen Dulles and others. One early note, unsigned but almost certainly written by Dulles, was quick to praise Blum’s “indefatigable energy and keen knowledge of the subject.”

A follow-up letter, dated the next day, praises Blum in more detail and credits him with being “largely responsible for the assembling of the data and for the direction of our investigations.”

In a previously TOP SECRET interview with Allen Dulles for the history of General Walter Smith’s tenure running the Agency, Dulles is even more candid. While Dulles, Jackson and Correa had all “put a great deal of time and thought into the survey,” it was Blum who “had done most of the work.” This apparently included doing “most of the investigation and writing.”

Blum’s responsibility for writing most of the report was also confirmed by Admiral Sidney Souers in a formerly TOP SECRET interview, while another document seems to show that Blum wrote the tentative outline for the final report.

One declassified history clarifies that Blum drafted the entire body of the report, with only the summary having been written by Jackson.

Blum’s work with the report didn’t end when it was issued. Blum was the executive secretary to McNarney while he worked on NSC 50, informally known as the McNarney Report. NSC 50 was, essentially, the comments and recommendations following up from the Dulles Report. As Admiral Souers noted, Blum was amused by the fact that he was essentially making recommendations on his own findings.

Blum’s work on the report was not entirely uncontroversial. While many of the findings and recommendations were ultimately accepted, the recommendation that DCI Hillenkoetter (among others) be replaced was met with considerable debate and resistance. It did, however, lay some of the the groundwork for Hillenkoetter’s later dismissal over the failure to produce any warning of North Korea’s invasion of South Korea, after which he was replaced by as DCI by General Smith.

Even amid the resistance to the possibility that Hillenkoetter be replaced, the effect of the report and the blame it placed on CIA’s leadership was “devastating,” according to one of CIA’s declassified histories.

According to one of the declassified interviews with Admiral Souers, the report’s recommendation that Hillenkoetter be replaced as DCI wasn’t accidental. Souers’ alleged that Blum had been determined “to get Hillenkoetter fired” and that this was the source of the Committee’s focus on CIA.

Hillenkoetter similarly blamed Blum for his being let go, apparently stating that everyone had been “mislead by a clever clerk, Robert Blum.”

The only work to discuss Blum’s involvement in this period in-depth is The Central Intelligence Agency – An Instrument of Government (through 1950), a formerly SECRET internal CIA History. According to the Agency’s History Staff, the report had a “definite and sometimes controversial point of view, heavily criticizing the Dulles Report. Reportedly, when Dulles later became head of the Agency he had access to the report further restricted.

The Dulles Report’s impact wasn’t limited to laying the groundwork for Hillenkoetter’s dismissal. It resulted in significant change to the way the Agency did business, replacing the Office of Reports and Estimates with three new offices: the Office of National Estimates, the Office of Research and Reports, and the Office of Current Intelligence. Parallel to those changes, Blum’s work with the NSC laid the groundwork for the creation of Office of Special Projects, quickly renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) and responsible for covert psychological operations and paramilitary action. Blum’s involvement wasn’t limited to the planning of NSC 10/2, which created the Office of Special Projects, he was involved in the implementation of NSC 10/2, as well.

When it was initially created, the OPC was a deliberately independent organization that reported through the State Department and coordinated with various parts of the Intelligence Community. This, however, was not to last. The Dulles Report, which was being prepared at the same time as the groundwork for the OPC, was issued several months later. The report not only recommended keeping the OPC within the Agency, it recommended combining it with the Office of Special Operations. Several years later, during period when DCI Smith was implementing reforms following on the Dulles Report, the OPC was combined with the Office of Special Operations to form the Directorate of Plans.

Considering these changes alone, the Congressional Research Service’s statement that the report’s “recommendations would become the blueprint for the future organization and operation of the present-day CIA” is hardly hyperbole. The report, which was largely directed, managed and written by Blum, served as the basis for a number of IC changes and reorganizations which were implemented and refined over the course of several years.

At the same time that Robert Blum was helping shape National Security Council’s (NSC) policies on covert psychological operations and paramilitary actions, Secretary of Defense Forrestal named Blum to the committee exploring the creation of the Armed Forces Security Agency – the direct predecessor to the NSA.

Image via Government Attic

According to an NSA history obtained by the Government Attic, Blum served Secretary of Defense Forrestal’s “non-voting personal representative” on the Committee on the Creation of a Unified Armed Forces Security Agency.

Image via Government Attic

According to CIA’s internally produced history on CIA and SIGINT, previously classified TOP SECRET, the purpose of the Committee was to create a charter for Armed Forces Security Agency (AFSA). Within a few years, the AFSA was replaced with the National Security Agency.

If he had remained on the NSC until NSA’s creation in 1952, Blum might have played a role in the formation of the NSA itself. By 1950, however, he had left Forrestal’s service and joined the Economic Cooperation Administration (ECA) first in the ECA’s mission to France, and then as the Chief of the ECA mission to Indochina, a component of the Marshall Plan. It was while on the ECA mission to Indochina that Blum would survive an assassination attempt by “communist terrorists using bullets and bombs.”

The ECA, however, was no mere economic agency. According to the CIA, the Marshall Plan’s execution was closely coordinated with the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC), which Blum had helped set up. Fittingly, some of the ECA’s programs would eventually be transferred to OPC. This is unsurprising considering the ECA’s explicit role in propaganda along with monetary policy. According to the reported Congressional testimony (attempts to locate an original copy of the hearing transcript were unsuccessful) of one former ECA mission chief, ECA funds were also used to covertly sponsor propaganda which they didn’t want traced back to the United States.

Within the ECA, Blum also served as the Special Assistant to the Assistant Administrator for the Program, Economic Cooperation Administration. It was during this period that he was made the Chief of the Special Technical and Economic Mission (STEM) to Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. It was this assignment that caused General DeLattre, the commander of the French expeditionary forces, to call Blum “the most dangerous man in Indochina” due to the role he was playing in the United States’ buildup and preparation for war in Vietnam.

United States Army in Vietnam, Advice and Support: The Early Years 1941-1960, a meticulously cited book published by the United States Army Center for Military History that references primary documents, elaborates further. Blum argued that it was time for the United States to assume a larger military role, and to “assume a direct influence commensurate with our contribution” in the formation of the Vietnamese National Army in one of the United States’ earliest proxy wars.

It’s this point that brings us the inaccuracy on the CIA’s website regarding Blum. To the Agency’s credit, the error didn’t originate with them, nor did they endorse it. The article in *Studies in Intelligence* comes with the disclaimer that “all statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in this article are those of the authors. Nothing in the article should be construed as asserting or implying US government endorsement of an article’s factual statements and interpretations.” The information itself came from a presentation which had been previously given and then adapted for the Agency’s publication.

Citing a French publication, the authors state that Blum was the head of STEM in Indochina in 1951, and that this was the same year he became president of the Committee for a Free Asia (CFA), later renamed the Asia Foundation. While it is true that the Blum would become the President for the Asia Foundation, this did not happen in 1951. According to a formerly SECRET memo from the CIA, at the time the CFA’s President pro tem had been George H. Greene. The end of his tenure wasn’t agreed upon until December 7, 1951, after which Alan Valentine was to take over. As subsequent documents confirm Valentine’s tenure as President of the CFA, and with only a secondary source located and asserting Blum was made the President in 1951, this claim about Blum from the Agency’s website can be safely dismissed.

To the Agency’s credit, and to the original author’s, the Asia Foundation’s website appears to be similarly mistaken about when Blum became the President of the Asia Foundation. The Asia Foundation, which has erased several years of its history, lists his Presidency as having begun in 1954 while claiming that he was their first President. As shown above, he was the Asia Foundation’s third President, at least. A declassified CIA memo also shows that he had assumed the leadership role at Asia Foundation by September 1953, at which point his CIA controller was apparently called “Shiney White”. It appears that Yale is the only one to get the year right, although they were mistaken about his reason for returning to the United States.

According to Allen Dulles, Blum was back in town to work for the Jackson Commission, more formally known as the Committee on International Information Activities. The Committee’s focus was on information warfare, propaganda, influence operations, with its report leading to the creation of the NSC’s Operations Coordinating Board as well as the United States Information Agency.

At this point, Blum was working for the Mutual Security Agency as the deputy for economic affairs in Europe, the successor to the ECA. It was from this posting that Blum was assigned to the Jackson Committee as the Director of its Staff, putting him once more in a position to help guide the Committee’s progress.

From January through June of 1953, Blum guided the Committee’s progress through a number of issues, many of which he coordinated with CIA Director Allen Dulles before the Committee meetings. These topics included the purpose of covert operations, when they should be used or avoided and how they should relate to foreign policy. Blum also suggested they look at their current and potential ability to conduct covert operations, which would inform their discussion of who should have responsibility for them. Blum was particularly interested in the extent to whether U.S.-identified propaganda should be replaced by non-attributed propaganda and whether or not psychological warfare was “a technique in its own right or an illusion that risks distorting the proper conception of foreign policy as a whole.”

According to a formerly SECRET series of CIA memos, one of the possibilities considered by the Jackson Committee was the “possibility of bringing in private enterprise – the super foundation idea.” The discussion of the question here is significant. While hardly a new idea, as the Agency had sponsored the creation and support of the Committee for a Free Asia/The Asia Foundation (known by the codename DTPILLAR) in 1951, a particular effort that actually went back to 1950, the question of whether to general expand those types efforts was under discussion with the next head of that foundation.

At several points, the Jackson Committee’s Report explicitly discusses the Committee for a Free Asia, which would soon become the Asia Foundation and be headed by Blum.

One of the purposes of the Asia Foundation was to allow the Agency to sponsor activities through a technically private organization, which would both enable the foundation to do things the government could, while simultaneously limiting the foundation from carrying out certain activities which the government could. The intention was to get around these pairs of limitations through extremely close cooperation and coordination, while still maintaining a clear degree of separation. With Blum, however, this separation was rather blurred in the beginning.

Shortly after Blum’s time with the Jackson Committee, the Mutual Security Agency which had employed him was dissolved on August 1, 1953 and replaced by the Foreign Operations Administration (FOA) as a result of Executive Order 10477. Under the FOA, the former Mutual Security Agency offices became known as United States Operations Missions (USOMs). By late September 1953, Blum had gone to work for the Asia Foundation, which remain ostensibly independent despite taking direction from and being funded almost entirely by the government. However, as late as November 1954, Blum was still employed by the FOA in one of the USOM offices.

Documents show that later Blum filed reports later that month on his visits to Cambodia and Vietnam made their way into CIA’s classified file on the Asia Foundation, known by the cryptonym DTPILLAR. These reports included information on the political and economic situations, as well as the activities of both foreign and American officials.

Clearly, there is more to Blum than meets the eye. During World War II he rose through the ranks of the OSS’ counterintelligence division, X-2, becoming first the head of X-2 in Paris and then the the Assistant Chief of the X-2 Branch. For this, he was awarded the French Legion of Honor and Croix de Guerre and the United States Medal for Freedom. After World War II, he made his way to CIA’s direct predecessor, the Counter Intelligence Group and then to the assistant to the Secretary of Defense. From that position, he deliberately pursued a policy that eventually helped lead to the dismissal of the CIA Director. He reorganized the Agency’s operations, from its analysis to its covert operations and propaganda efforts, while helping to create the National Security Agency’s direct predecessor. He help lay the groundwork for the Vietnam War along with the United States’ system of covertly funding propaganda and psychological efforts. When he helped reshape the United States’ system of unacknowledged propaganda a second time, he was involved in discussions considering the increased use of private foundations, one of which he went on to lead. During this time he worked with his controller, “Shiney White”, and continued to report to the Agency while using Agency funds to pull strings across through Asia until he officially retired from the foundation. Following his retirement from the Asia Foundation, he remained active for several years until his death.

Virtually from the shadows, Blum pulled on the strings that reshaped both the Intelligence Community and large parts of the world. Blum’s influence continued to spread under the CIA funded and directed Asia Foundation. This group, as well as the attempts by it and others to erase and rewrite portions of its history, will be explored in a follow-up article.

August 17, 2017
Written by Emma Best
Edited by JPat Brown

Find this story at 17 August 2017 part 1
Find this story at 17 August 2017 part 2

© 2010–2017 Muckrock